Party Walls

Five Misconceptions about The Americans with Disabilities Act

This past summer, the country celebrated the 30th anniversary of the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Despite the progress of the past few decades, there are still misconceptions about what the law requires for buildings and facilities. Below are five of the most common misconceptions our consultants encounter.

Cover pages of the ADA Title III Regulations and the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design1.      All buildings that predate the ADA are exempt from accessibility requirements.

Unlike building codes, the ADA does not contemplate the concept of “grandfathering.” Included in the ADA regulation is the ongoing obligation for barrier removal, despite the age of a building. Specifically, if a barrier to access exists in a building that predates the ADA, then there is an obligation to remove the barrier if it is readily achievable to do so. Readily achievable means that fixing the barrier does not involve too much difficulty or expense. Such determinations must be made on a case-by-case basis and consider many factors, including financial resources.

2.      Following the accessibility requirements of the building code will satisfy the accessibility requirements of the ADA.

Even though the 2010 Standards for Accessible Design (the technical standard referenced by the ADA) is similar to the technical standards referenced by many building codes (e.g., A117.1 Standard for Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities), they are mutually exclusive. Compliance with the accessibility requirements of the building code does not satisfy compliance with the accessibility requirements of the ADA; and, vice versa. The general rule of thumb is to apply all applicable laws, codes, and standards and comply with the most stringent requirement.

3.      The DOJ has a formal certification process to approve ADA compliant products.

There is no official certification available for ADA compliant products, nor does the DOJ certify buildings as meeting the requirements of the ADA. A product manufacturer’s claim of ADA compliance is not reviewed or approved by the DOJ. Often, claims of ADA compliance made by manufacturers are not correct.  Architects and designers must carefully review the details and dimensions and provide context for installation to ensure compliance.

In short, buyer beware when selecting products.

4.      Whenever a building is required to be accessible, that means it must comply with the ADA.

The term “ADA” is often used as shorthand for anything related to accessibility, yet the ADA does not apply to many types of facilities. For example, although a market rate multifamily residential building that includes only dwelling units and resident amenities is required to be accessible under the Fair Housing Act and local building codes, it is not required to comply with the ADA. Compliance with the ADA is only required to the extent that the ADA applies. Understanding project scoping is key to determining which laws and/or codes apply.

5.      Movable tables in a restaurant are not required to be accessible because the Standards cover only built-in furnishings.

While it is true that the ADA Standards cover fixed or built-in elements, the broader mandate of the ADA regulation requires equal access. Put another way, the ADA Standards are focused on the built environment, much like a building code, and the ADA is a civil rights law that has an overarching objective of ensuring equitable use for all.

Read about the Five Misconceptions about Fair Housing Act Design and Construction Compliance here!


Image of Andy Yarrish


Written by Andy Yarrish, Senior Accessibility Consultant



Share This Entry

Comments are closed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *